Hello Martin,

>Hey, Denis.
>
>>Like I told to Tracy Holzer in another thread. I don't need .Net but I don't doubt for a minute that eventually I'll be FORCED to use it.
>>
>>But as long as VFP does the job for me I'll continue to use it. So to me Sedna is a win-win situation. It'll let me learn/use .net slowly (if I need it) while I continue to use VFP.
>>
>>When VFP is'nt able to do what I have to do then I just hope that the version of .Net available at that time will make the transition from VFP to .Net very easy.
>>
>>In the meantime I still use what is the best development tool for what I have to do, VFP.
>
>It was not encouraging when Beth recommend you to stick to VFP while you don't need to go to more complex architectures.
>
>Come on, boy, you have years of VFP development ahead if you want!
>
>Regards,

I'll reply to you with one word. INSECURITY. It's tough to deal with that ;-)

But in the end you're right. Beth's words were comforting.