Why do you need visual desiners in this case?

>
>Thanks for the response, it would seem that converting my vcx based classes to prg is my only option.
>
>It does seem a bit like a backward step , in order to gain integration with .NET you have to lose all the visual tools to maintain classes and revert back to prg based classes.
>
>It also seem weird that you can define the visability of the class methods, hidden/protected etc using the visual class designer but you cannot specify strongly typed parameters or return values.
>
>but, again, thanks for the reply..