>>Well, even VFP 3 is better than VB. But (don't ask me why) M$ has always bet higher in VB. In such a way that lots of clients demand that the software should be developed in VB. So, I'll have to stick with both.
>>As soon as I put my hands on VFP5, I'll develop all the apps in VFP5, using VB just for 16 bit development and as a condition...
>
>
>Nice point -- 16 bit apps. But as VFP grows more complex will you be able to support both platforms -- and have the time?
>
>Tom

I'll have to. We just can say to clients "Get Win95 to all your 50 computers, and if you don't have Pentiums buy them too. Or else we won't supply the software.". Boy, tell me about 'software', yeah, shure...