>>Having this add constantly blinking at me in this forum is a bit annoying. What I find reprehensible and possibly illegal depending on a particular application's licening agreement is the following bullet on that web-site:
>>
>>
* Reverse engineering FoxPro code to generate system specification>>
>>Anyone else see a problem with that statement? This can be found at
http://www.diaspark.com/migration/>
>I was going to complain about that ad, but then didn't want to be accused again of telling people what they can say/do.
>
>I'd definitely have a problem with someone taking MY FP/VFP ***CODE***, as code or APP or EXE, and reverse engineering it.
>Couldn't argue with replicating how they SEE the application outwardly, but code and table structures has a stench of thievery to me.
Same here. I am not complaining about the purpose of the ad or the use of .Net either. I have a HUGE problem with the skullduggery of stealing someone's code to make your job easier to convert it under another dev tool.
Mark McCasland
Midlothian, TX USA