Renoir,

Might you be confusing Iraq with Afghanistan?

The 9/11 Commission was quite clear that there was NO CONNECTION between Iraq and 9/11. Admittedly, Vice president Cheney knows otherwise, but he seems to be alone on the matter.





>I was implying that. You clarified your position to some degree though. The fact that Iraq was involved has been proven to the extent that they protected and harbored the terrorists who were behind the attacks. They provided the resources and training facilities. Was it Iraq nationals that directly flew the planes into the buildings? No, but it was Iraq's infrastructure and political attitude that condoned and supported it. Not a very fine hair to split in my book.
>
>>Are you implying that I beleive we should not wage war on terrorists?
>>
>>I never said we should do nothing about terrorism. I think we should hunt
>>down and destroy every last terrorist we can find.
>>
>>I said we should not have attacked Iraq.
>>
>>There never has been any proof that Iraq was involved in the 9/11
>>attacks (or any other terrosist attacks, that we know of), so therefore
>>the war against Iraq is unjustified. Just because Saddam Hussein was a bad
>>bad guy and treated his people bady, doesn't make it the responsibility of
>>the United States to take him out. And it doesn't make him an international
>>terrorist with his sights on the US.
>>
>>I suppose one could argue that someday they might have launched attacks against
>>America, but supposition is not justification.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>I see the 'peace loving' Islamics have struck again.
>>>>
>>>>My condolences to those in the UK.
>>>
>>>And what should we do about that? Oh, wait, I know. Nothing. That'll show them!