General information
Category:
Visual FoxPro and .NET
Alejandro,
I very much second your POV!
This version thing is no real argument. The last two or three would be sufficient. .Net´s on the market since 2002 and I already got three of ´em on my laptop. (1.0, 1.1 and 2beta)
As far as I understand they gonna go even one step further in Longhorn and ship MSBuild with it, so apps can be dynamically rebuilt on the fly.
But all this implies a radical paradigm shift that developers pay for the development environment and not for the right to ship the runtime.
OTOH such shifts are quite frequent these days - and it always depends on marketing intentions. Crown jewels which used to cost big bucks all of a sudden are available in a trimmed down version. And the bigger market pressure gets the less the trimming.
Just one example: SQL Server 2000 and 2005 and MSDE and SQL Express.
Very much comparable, even SEVERAL leagues higher than VFP.
So it depends on corp policy if the unthinkable all of a sudden is a natural.
Sorrily this doesn´t seem to be the case with VFP.
Could spoil some plans if VFP all of a sudden would be a scripting language for Web dev,... etc. etc. and contend with VB.Net... Let VB look really old with its db capabilities...
Cheers
G
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only