>>If something as wonderful as creation not "Just Happen" how could something even more wonderful and with the ability to bring it all about "Just Happen?" In other words, "Who created God?"
>
>Oh, so you ignore first question and then pose an unanswerable one!

The idea of creation reduces the complete history of the universe to one step, the creation. The rest of history is supposed to follow from it. So the answer to all the questions of the "but what happened before this, and how did that come into existence" are explained by one act. And now we're supposed to stop the process for no good reason and not apply the same question ("what happened before this, and how did that come into existence") to it?

> Well, explain electricity?

Any book on physics should do.

> Where does the wind come from, and where does it go?

Come? Go? That's anthropomorphism. Wind is not a person or animal. It's the mechanics of the fluids, qv. in the corresponding area of physics.

> There are many things that can't be explained, but that doesn't deny their existence, does it? I wouldn't have much faith in a God, I could fully understand.

I don't have faith in science. I only trust it to be the explanation of what is happening, as good one as we can do at this point. Until the better science comes along. I also trust that it will move and develop, and that some things I took for granted will be proven wrong or at least incomplete. Of course, I'll stick to this explanation for as long as it's valid - or try to check some of it myself, if I am able. So it will grow, without any need to believe in everything it says.