>>If that is the case it is not necessarily a deity. It could be natural.
>
>So, were it not a deity, that would make sense to you, eh?

No. As you said before you are familiar with the scientific process. If it turns out and proved that it is a deity then I see nothing wrong with that notion. But using Occam's razor and looking and all evidence so far, I tend to think it is more likely to be a natural-physical process. But you never know. That's what science is, new discoveries and always open to new and better explanations.



>>Have you ever read: "The Blind Watchmaker" by Richard Dawkins?
>
>No.

You should try it and see a scientist's point of view.