Sorry, I did not see Borislav had already suggested it when I posted my message. Best of luck.

>Hi Greg,
>
>I knew about that character string, but my procedure needs to look at just 30 to 40 (at the moment) fields from a 120+ fields in the table, so that does not get me what I really need. Hilmer gave me the best solution so far, I am trying to implement it now.
>
>Thanks anyway.
>Beth
>>If you are using buffering, take a look at GetFldState( -1 )
>>