Yes, extremely interesting. I have a copy of the Library, and what put me onto it, strangely enough was a book I read mmmblmmmbl years ago called 'Valis', by Phillip K. Dick. I then read a book called 'The Gnostic Gospels' by Elaine Pagels because I wasn't really sure if Dick's mentioning of the Library wasn't just a fiction device for his book. It seemed like it must be something real. The Pagels book was fascinating. I got a copy of the Library eventually from the publisher in New York.

>I have been browsing these and find them very interesting.
>
>http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/nhlintro.html
>http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html
>
>>And the Nag Hammadi library manuscripts that were discovered prior to the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls but were suppressed because they didn't fit with the Catholic Church's ideologies.
>>
>>>And what about the Apocrypha? should they or should they not be added to the bible?
>>>
>>>>> Since the Bible is written by men (inspired by God) and men are fallible, who knows if they got it right or not?
>>>>
>>>>What people call the bible, was result of people collecting relgious works together. The sections of which are of unknown authorship.
>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_canon