>>It can't explain everything. There will always be more questions. And that's one thing I can almost believe: that new knowledge will bring more questions.
>
>I was speaking hypothetically (for the sake of argument). I don't think it can't explain everything either. That's my belief...er...hope...er...assumption...er...nevermind. :-)

And, besides, it's so fuc*ing impossible to define "Everything" :).

So even if science would some day claim to have explained everything (or that it has a viable Theory of Everything), we'd have no clue whether that everything really is all there is, or maybe they've forgotten a few bits.