>It seems that "argument" consists of selection of examples which may not be challenged and for which counter-examples are judged irrelevant. And there we apparently remain permanently fixed with the church as culprit. Seems like an anti-intellectual waste of time to me.
I see your point, but in general religion has been a regressive force in terms of science, education and civil progress.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only