I'm simply pointing out that the British are on the ball
with this.

Given 4 years, the Bush administration tells you to feel safer
but has not results to back them up.




>Funny... I thought the subject was whether I felt safer. So, you believe killing others is directly associated with safety?
>
>>The subject of this post is persons captured/killed invloved
>>in the attacks.
>>
>>The only person captured event remotely connected to the
>>9/11 attacks was Zacharias Moussoui.
>>
>>This is not an open invitiation to include all the other
>>people the Bush camp would have you believe are involved,
>>as there are many scapegoats, but no tangible suspects.
>>
>>As for Hussein, there has never been any proof at all that
>>he had anything to do with the attacks. he may have wanted
>>to attack the US, but wanting someone dead does not make
>>you a murderer.
>>
>>And none of the hundreds of detainees held in Cuba have ever been
>>tied to 9/11, although they probably would have helped attack
>>us if they could have. But again, wanting someone dead does not
>>make you a murderer.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>It's been a week and a half since the first London bombings.
>>>>
>>>>They have killed 1 attacker and captured to more. Nice job!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>In the 4 years since the World Trade Center bombings, the
>>>>Bush administration has caught 1 person.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Don't You Feel Safer?
>>>
>>>I feel just as safe as I did before 9/11. It's all attitude and how you choose to live your life. I am more likely to be killed driving to or from work on our freeways than I am by a terrorist strike. You can choose to be cynical, unsafe, and hole-up in your house. If you do, then you are virtually dead anyway. As for the 1 person, you are grossly under-exagerating. I am assuming you are referring to Saddam. You do not count any of the other high ranking terrorists captured or killed? Saddam's now 2 very dead sons? etc...