>Sergey.
>
>>I don't see a problem in using either of them. I would stay away from TTOS() UDF or any other in the index keys because cure would be worse than decease.
>
>LOL. That's cute. No offense intended. You may have intended to use "decease" which made me laugh. This "cure" is not worse than dying. :)
>
>I think you meant to write "disease".
>
>However TTOS is not worse than the disease. It is completely valid to extend the language with new functions especially when certain functions can legitimately be considered missing.
>
>I'd only add that since it is a UDF it perhaps should have a different prefix just in case VFP does include a TTOS function in a new version. One could then replace all MYTTOS with TTOS.

Hi Mike,

Thanks for catching my typo. The matter certanly is not worth dying for. <g>

To clarify, I'm for extending language with UDFs but I don't think they should be used in indexes.