>>>>Some time ago McDonald's got sued because somebody got burned by their coffee. So after that incident they had a warning "Be careful the coffee can be very hot" or something similar. A funny thing MacDonald's chould have done (not only MacDonald's but every shops serving coffee) is to serve cold coffee from that day and tell it's customers "Go heat it at home because we can't guarantee the heat of it. Sorry but since we got sued by XYZ that's the way we have to do it." I guess that XYZ would receive tons of happy mails ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>The McDonald's lawsuit was not about serving coffee. It was about serving coffee much hotter than the industry standard, despite a history of serious burns:
>>>
>>>http://lawandhelp.com/q298-2.htm
>>
>>I don't know about you but when I drink coffee I expect that it'll be hot. If it's hotter than usual then I'll be more careful when drinking it.
>>
>>I understand though that accidents can happen. But sometimes there are way too many accidents and that could become suspicious.
>
>Did you look at the link I posted?

No but I read it now.

>Apparently, there'd been a serious of scalding accidents involving their coffee, which they were serving 20 degrees hotter than others. Yes, you expect hot coffee to be hot, but an additional 20 degrees is a lot.

Excuse me for not reading it. There was really a problem with their coffee. But we hear of so many cases where individuals sue enterprises just to make a quick buck. I thought that it was the case too here.