But would that make Visual Basic into Visual Advanced?

>We may be getting closer to Visual FoxBasic < s >
>
>
>>JR,
>>
>>>It seems absurd... in medicine, complex labels are needed so practitioners can discuss complex situations efficiently. In IT, complex labels are needed to describe simple points because if you say an un-PC word like Fox, fellow "professionals" will shout you down. Such is life.
>>
>>Yag has just posted more details about VB-future-data, including a revised session description (Paul Vick) at the VS Data team blog:
>>
>>http://blogs.msdn.com/vsdata/archive/2005/08/05/PDC_New_Abstract.aspx
>>
>>I think you can get the idea from this post that Yag has been able to greatly influence what VB will do with data, and that perhaps the news from PDC will be what you've been looking for.
>>
>>To paraphrase the old saying about roses: "A Fox by another other name is just as sweet (or sly, and hopefully, as fast)." Of course, I know a statement like that can get people angry and sound like I'm abandoning VFP -- not the case. I mean that for those VFP people who have to work in .NET also, it will be sweet if we get something close to Fox in .NET.