Paulo;

I am a Vietnam veteran. Nuclear war is not something that is taken lightly by the United States. The use of nuclear weapons could easily escalate into the end of the world, as we know it.

In Vietnam it was not uncommon for a five-year-old child to carry a satchel charge and walk into a crowd or building to kill as many people as possible. You did not know who the enemy was as you do not know what is in the mind of another person. I cannot imagine using nuclear weapons against such an environment.

The feelings of people towards events of the past is different than those of people who lived during an event. It is easy to evaluate and criticize events of the past and not attempt to understand the moment you are attempting to evaluate. You are limited to using your own value system. Man is not perfect.

I have a friend who uses this expression, “Come the Revolution we will do it right this time”! The problem is that nothing is ever perfect. Nothing is ever acceptable to everyone.

Tom



>If that is truth, why did not use the bomb in the Vietnam?
>
>They do not try to convince me. They speak on statisticians with the ones that had died. They speak with the multisides
>
>If a son its was in Hiroshima or Nakasaki, taking a walk in that day?
>
>It would be a hero of War?
>
>I am a Man of Peace. For this, I desired to remember deceased in the past, therefore still we have a great atomic armory.
>
>
>>Balance the numbers and, since horror is inevitable, I prefer the horror of the bomb to the prolonged horror with many times more casulties of a protracted invasion campaign.