>>Naomi,
>>
>>May not help much with that amount of memory, but putting the view dbcs on the user's machines can help.
>>
>>Regards,
>
>That's the tip I got from UT for some time ago (I believe, Barbara Peisch mentioned, that there is a problem accessing view definitions from the server's database). I think, one of the ways to improve this application would be to switch to cursor adapters. We're already using Cursor Adapters for new biz objects, but we have lots of existing biz objects which use local views.
>
>We also need a better CA builder. Presently we're using Mark McCasland's builder and we're happy with it, but we really need more features. We need to be able to select specific table to build the CA and also we want to create PRG, not VCX.
>
>There was a problem with one view, where one important index was missing. However, we already fixed that problem, so this is not it.
>
>I'm not sure, how can I reduce memory on my PC to try Fabio's suggestion.

Naomi,

= SYS(3050,1,val(SYS(1001))/8)
= SYS(3050,2,val(SYS(1001))/8)

Should limit your 1 GB machine to about 256 K, evenly split between the Foreground and Background buffers.

Regards,
<