Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Does a PRG class execute faster than a VCX based class?
Message
De
11/08/2005 23:44:31
 
 
À
11/08/2005 05:33:54
Cetin Basoz
Engineerica Inc.
Izmir, Turquie
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 6 SP5
OS:
Windows XP SP2
Network:
Windows XP
Database:
Visual FoxPro
Divers
Thread ID:
01040117
Message ID:
01040472
Vues:
26
Cetin,

First off, THANKS TO EVERYONE who has replied! =)

The reason for this thread is that our team is trying to find "common ground" - we intend to come up with our own set of common base classes, and that we are evaluating what's the best way.

Would it be better to have one common method of doing classes (VCX OR PRG)?

Or would a mixed (VCX AND PRG) way of doing classes not be any issue? Or would it create havoc/confusion? (Like having to switch between a text editor and the visual class designer?)

A VCX class can be converted to a PRG class - is it also so vice versa?


Sincerely
Dennis



>>Hi All,
>>
>>I and a friend are having a discussion on how to best create and maintain classes. He suggested that we programmatically code our classes. I, however, am very comfortable designing/coding classes visually - that is, using the Visual Class Designer.
>>
>>Although one can very well convert a VCX based class (or a Form even) to a PRG class via Class Browser/View Code, the issue of performance and best practices comes to mind.
>>
>>Which executes faster? Is coding classes programatically more popular? Or better practice?
>>
>>Many thanks to anyone who shares his/her insights!
>>
>>Dennis
>
>Dennis,
>I think your words answer it:
>"I, however, am very comfortable designing/coding classes visually"
>IMHO take whichever you're comfortable with.
>Cetin
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform