>>I made the loop go backwards because I'm concerned that as you delete items, the position of items in the list may change. I think it won't happen until you requery, but I didn't want to the chance (and didn't have a minute to test).
>>
>>Tamar
>
>Should it be step -1 then in for loop?

Yep. That's the hazard of writing code in the UT without testing it. <s>

Tamar