Quicker question. Who appointed you censor of the censors?????

Ken

>Quick question. who appointed you censor of VFP conferences???? Can't you just follow the old saying about changing the channel if you don't like what's on.
>
>Have you ever considered the possibility that there are many, many, many VFP developers looking to become .net programmers? And VFP conferences will be the best place to find sessions on learning .net from a VFP perspective.
>
>There's plenty of room for both types of presentations, working with .net from vfp, and leveraging your vfp knowledge to learn .net.
>
>As a matter of fact, from what I've read about this conference, MS related speakers will be speaking about .net for vfp developers. But other speakers will discuss working with .net from vfp. So both sides will be covered.
>
>I think there's 2 problems with folks trying to censor these conferences:
>
>1) You're not the one making the effort to put the conference on. If you don't like it, don't go
>2) It's obvious that there are far more vfp programmers looking to become .net programmers, then there are vfp programmers looking to work with both at the same time. Just look at the questions here on the UT. I don't think you'll find too many questions involving VFP on any other forum addressing .net.
>
>>I think it's good to present purely .NET topics for a few breakout sessions, but, the focus should be on developing with VFP if it is indeed a vfp conference. Sometimes I get the impression that Ken, Rick and some of the others are using the old "bait and hook" ploy to push their new .NEt baby. I think, for a vfp conference, the focus of most sessions dealing with .NET should be using it to full advantage with VFP not as a replacement.
>>My 2cents.