>Hi Tore,
>
>Thanks for the feedback.
>
>I have been using VFP for at least six years and have served
>over a score of clients at least. I have also used other technologies
>as well like Visual C++ and Java. In fact, it is this fact of having
>used the other technologies that kinda made me start asking why
>on earth have I been doing the same stuff with VFP over and over
>again - despite the fact that I have existing libraries already.
>I exclusively use VCX.
>
>The idea to generate the codes and then edit them using the
>built-in Visual Class designer would be terrible indeed! That's why
>I explained in my other reply my thoughts on the Visual Class designer.

So, now I understand. Each class should be unique. There should be very few custom settings to use them in your system. That means there should be little need to generate any code.

>
>The reason I still prefer working with VFP is that it's really
>damn fast working with data!
>
>Again, thanks! :)