Great comments and agree 100%, but I think you're wasting your breath on some of it. I can't believe that your primary audience could ever imagine being a policeman in the first place. It's not part of their character. A victim? Now that they're all over, for sure.

>I agree that this guy being killed should not have happened, but to call the London policemen murderers is convicting them and killing their character without knowing all the facts.
>
>The police are told that if someone is a suicide bomber, shot them in the brain so that they cannot detonate their bomb. I have no problem with that. It is the best way to end the crisis with the lowest number of deaths and damage. I have no problem with a suicide bomber being shot 8 times, or even 108 times.
>
>The problem is that the man was not a suicide bomber. Is the guilty one the one who pulled the trigger or the one who said on the radio “He is a suicide bomber”? Based on what I’ve heard, I suspect it’s the one misspeaking on the radio. But without knowing more, I’m not going to convict that person yet either. I still trust that they will do what it takes to get answers.
>
>It’s OK to put yourself in the place of someone like a family member of the man who was killed by police. But, to be fair you should also look at it in the eyes of a policeman that has been assigned to protecting the public from someone who has no value for your life, the general public, or even their own life.
>
>Picture yourself in the role of the policeman. You are told that the guy is a suicide bomber. What guy? That guy, right there – He IS a suicide bomber. He’s coming towards you. What do you do? Do you ask, “Hey are you a bomber?” If your information is correct, you can’t ask that question. You’ll be dead before you finish the question.
>
>
>>The man shot by the London police was not struggling nor desobeying and not wearing a heavy "bulky" coat, according to a footage.
>>
>>They shot him 8 times....
>>Are the London police getting away with this murder?