>Hi Fabio,
>
>You are right. It's example wit one bug in grid.
>The first column shows same values if second grid get focus, because value for first column is from third table - XXT900 (use SET RALETION).
>This "bug" is possible pass by use SELECT SQL with XXT000 and XXT900 instead XXT000 and XXT900 with relation.
>
>MartinJ
>

Hi Martin,
this is the first "SET RELATION" rollback step.

If we start to add functions: select rows, context menu,
column visual reorder, editing,
table buffers with multiple tables computations ....
at the end SET RELATION will be dismantled.

The grid has not been built thinking about using it in this way
( and John K. he has clearly told this),
because the order of the calls of the events is not correct.

It is possible to make to work it (and I have done this, also in formality of editing... )
but the program is fragile a lot.

Besides, without a dynamicRowHeight the use of the pixels is not efficient.

Fabio