SNIP
>>Finally, since one can not predict what will next come out of the mouths of idiots, what kind of "rules" would you propose and what penalties would be attendant with the rules?
>
>Finally and again, I am not the person who makes the rules. Moreover, the rules already exist.

Then Pat Robertson broke no rule because the rule that applies, criminally, is that he is free to say what he pleases.

And if this is now a debate between me and you about rules versus no rules, then I hereby exit.
It is crystal clear to me that the only rule that can apply in the criminal sense, other than yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theatre, is UNLIMITED SPEECH. No rules preventing speech of any type.