>hi all,
>any idea .
>
>Consider the following set of functional dependancies :
>
>
>
>F = { AB ــ> CD , D ـــ> EF , G ــــ> A , Eــــــ>B , C ــــ> G }
>
>
>
>a- prove that the following two functional dependencies are entailed by F , using only the definition of a functional dependency :
>
>
>
>1 - DG ــــ> AEF
>
>2 - EG ـــــ> FG
>
>thanks.
What do you mean with "functional dependency"? And what do the combinations, like "AB" or "EF" stand for?
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
