>Thks Tamar & Christof.
>
>I don't know how it happened, but I was so firmly convinced about this with SetAll... Ever since then, I simply disregarded this method (as almost useless) and used my own suplement.
>
>Well, everyday we learn something 'new' :))
>
>However, it wld be very usefull if SetAll method had sort of 'listener'
>method binded together, and receiving reference to current object accessed.
>So next to just being able to set one object property, we could have chance (place) to add more code to effectively handle all container controls.

You can curse at this all you want, but you can re-curse as well. Download #21923.