>>>>Owwwww....watch out ... you might insult our 2.6 friends :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>*LOL* Just trying to keep us from going down in the same flames..
>>>>>
>>>>>>He's right. Nobody writes dBase anymore. Anyone with a brain uses VFP.
>>>
>>>
>>>With the new component gallery and Fox Foundation Classes, there shouldn't be any reason to not use VFP over FPW/FPD.
>>Craig,
>> I believe there were a few threads on VFP vs FP 2.x a while back.. And in them, some folks came up with some reasons why they still do development in FP 2.x, yes mainly in Dos..
>
>
>Then my question is "Why are you still in DOS?" With the cost of hardware today, I'm hardpressed to see a reason to still be there.
Craig,
The reason I am still stuck with FPD, is I have a 4.5 MB FPD application and I am sticking with it until I can port it to VFP.
I am finally getting a feel of how to do it, with the help of Microendeavors and others.
Alex
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only