>Mike
>
>>If one puts closely related classes into the single distribution unit.
>
>Which is what I consider the optimal design.
>
>>>The design of the packaging of classes is nearly as important as the class designs themselves.
>>
>>I'm not sure about that.
>
>I am sure of it. And it seemed to me a lot of your argument was based on poorly chosen classlib packaging.
>
Could you please expand on the term packaging? I have found nothing about classlib packaging. Classes "package" data and functionality (not necessarily code) into a finite object. IOW there is no difference between class packaging and class design. Grouping classes together into a classlib seems specific to FoxPro.