Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
State of LA Blocks Red Cross from New Orleans
Message
De
13/09/2005 15:19:11
 
 
À
13/09/2005 01:19:50
Information générale
Forum:
Weather
Catégorie:
Ouragans
Divers
Thread ID:
01047972
Message ID:
01049184
Vues:
16
The possibility of blackmail and security clearances come into play too. Since Clinton basically got off scott-free for lying under oath and then taking into consideration the reason for the lie, I don't think blackmail will be a serious threat when someone holds a position that requires a top secret clearance anylonger. Still, in my opinion, no President, no matter how great, should be excused lying under oath. Others were jailed for refusing to testify and also for lying under oath. There is no excuse for perjury at any level.


>>When I hear that the president is in big trouble because he wanted a little extra nookie. It kind of perks my ears. Doesn't seem to me that anyone, other then Hillary is being hurt in the process.
>
>In this example you gave, Clinton wasn't impeached because of his relationship with M. L. It was because he lied to the grand jury under oath. You knew that... didn't you please tell me you did? That has to mean something doesn't it? Even if its for silly thing as having a little woopie session.
>
>BTW for all the time he spent doing whatever he did with M. L. can I have my tax money back that paid his salary? I didn't pay my tax so he can have a fling in the Oval Office during work hours. :-)
>If you and I did that at work (especially during working hours), we'd be fired immediately... I know I would be.
>
>Back to the subject at hand. Did you know that they had a dry run of their emergency procedure not too long ago and they knew it had problems and they never worked to iron out the problems. Is that still the fed's fault.
>
>It sounds to me like you're wanting the feds to act in a "perfect" way. But you know that when gov't is in charge of something, they more often then not, screw it up.
>Bush already said that the reponse wasn't acceptable. At least he's man enough to admit it. Frankly, I haven't heard Nagin or Blanco admit they were part of the problem as well. And believe they're not innocent.
>
>Again, lot blame to go around.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform