I understand perfectly that you wish to believe this Administration deliberately lied to justify evicting a ruthless, brutal and murderous regime from power based on best available information available at the time. Not to mention the constantly broken, ignored and violated UN resolutions, sanctions, etc. Not to mention the Oil-for-food scandal that explains the positions of Russia, Germany and France.

My comment regarding we are the same voters who put the Clinton's in office a second time had ZIP to do with Iraq, etc. You interjected that, not me. It aboslutely had to do with people who vote are in general poorly educated with respect to what a particular candidate represents. This is in no small part to the media who filter what we see and hear and to the candidates who talk in sound bites.

I was clearly also addressing this one point and only the point indicated in the subject of this thread.

>Seriously, are you even reading what you are writing?????
>
>I've stated many times already, this has nothing to do with democrat, liberal, conservative, republican.
>
>This has everything to do with someone lying about his personal life and being put thru the wringer at the peoples expense. Then we have someone lying to justify a war and causing untold deaths.
>
>Do you understand the difference between the two? I seriously think there's something wrong with your thought process on this one.
>
>
>>>>>Those of us on the outside still don't fully understand how he came to be re-elected and the best many of us can do is to attribute it to artful fostering of a climate of fear and on-going war.
>>>>
>>>>The very same who could re-elect the Clinton's after all the scandals in his first term.
>>>
>>>And what did Judge Starr do about those "scandals", prosecution-wise?
>>>Again, from the outside, it looked like those scandals all turned out to be nothing of substance.
>>>In other words, a very different situation.
>>
>>Only to those wearing liberal-colored glasses. Although Lewinsky erupted during the second term, that scandal fairly well described what kind of character he has and confirmed him as an admitted liar (even under oath).