Once again, you are trying to justify something that I think there's no justification for at all. I wouldn't be willing to accept it from anyone.

When I originally watched the movie in a home theatre with 150 others, there was a hugh hush to the room when they showed the talking head on Fox compare the amount of deaths in Iraq for the month to the amount of road deaths in California. You don't find anything unusal with someone trying to equate the two?

Then there's the little problem of Fox's "fair and balanced" statement.

And no, I don't think you could do this with any news organization. There were several instances were the crowd watching the movie became hushed. I might disagree, or not believe what I'm hearing from other news sources, but I've only felt rage from one other situation.

There was an instance several years ago of a NBA player loosing control of his vehicle and dying. ESPN had a 5 minute story talking about how sad the situation was. They went on and on for his family, for his team, etc. At the end of them droning on and on the announcer casually mentioned that, oh yea, his girlfriend was a passenger and she's in critical shape.

How I felt after that one story on ESPN is how I feel everytime I view Fox.

PF







>>It was from a documentary last year or the year before entitled "outfoxed". It was painstakingly put together by have a hugh bank of VCRs recording Fox 24 hours a day for about a month. During that month they had a team of volunteers watching Fox and reporting back instances they found particularly bad.
>
>>Finally the editors went back to the tapes to catalog the clips that people had reported.
>
>Yeah, but what does this prove?
>Can't you do this to any news agency and find something "bad" on it/them?