>>It was from a documentary last year or the year before entitled "outfoxed". It was painstakingly put together by have a hugh bank of VCRs recording Fox 24 hours a day for about a month. During that month they had a team of volunteers watching Fox and reporting back instances they found particularly bad.
>
>>Finally the editors went back to the tapes to catalog the clips that people had reported.
>
>Yeah, but what does this prove?
>Can't you do this to any news agency and find something "bad" on it/them?

Not since Dan Rather left CBS in disgrace. Maybe that should read a disgraced Dan Rather left CBS. Nah, it should be since a disgraced Dan Rather left a disgraced CBS.