>HI peter,
>
>>My faith in judges is quite low, because I think that many of them (okay, some of them) are not intelligent enough for the job.
>
>hmmm sound like discrimination??
Huh? So, every negative opinion is discrimination? I think, the first person to oppose that idea is Walter Meester. :)
>>But how can I prove this? There is no public list of their EQ/IQ-scores. And what score is high enough according to me? And which factors are important here? Empathy, analitical? Judges are always alpha-scientists. How would a beta-scientist score in court? It is probably too difficult to discuss here. Others can easilly say the opposite of what I say and in the end we would probably have to agree to disagree.
>
>I do not have any practical experiences with judges, so I really could not say much about your opinion.
Like you, I too am a very civilized person who has not ever been in court. The exception is a traffic fine that I didn't agree with. THAT judge was a morron, I tell you.
Do you know that in the U.S. 715 out of 100,000 people are in jail? In the Netherlands 123 people only. (Source: Charles Groenhuijsen) Is this proof that on average U.S. citizens are more evil people than we are? <g>
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
