>You Say:
>>
>>It is not a question of political leaning of this or that judge. It is a question of upholding the law, which we do not seem to do that well in this country when there is a law that we don't like.
>>
>
>
>But I asked you at first to tell me what makes you think the Constitution states to remove "God" from the pledge of aligience? It all goes back to you are interpreting it for the whole, when in fact given the chance the majority of the whole did put it in there.
>
>Alex we can end this here and now by simply agreeing to this statement: “Divisiveness is caused by multiple interpretations. “
>
>We just interpret things differently.
>I don’t hold that against you and wish you well in having your interpretation become a reality.
>But in the mean time I have to put my faith in the majority (congress) which voted to put the phrase in.
>I will respect a majority (congress) that takes it out.
>I do not respect a minority (court) pushing their opinion on the majority.
Bret;
And yet we have safeguards to protect the minority from the majority. I like what Nietzsche said about laws: “Laws are made by the weak to protect them from the strong”! :)
Tom
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement