Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Judge: School Pledge Is Unconstitutional
Message
From
17/09/2005 02:02:55
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Articles
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01049590
Message ID:
01050557
Views:
17
How can we have interesting discussions when you can't grasp why others find your statements frightening????

Please justify for me the stife that's occurred for how many years in Ireland with Christians vs. Protestants? How about Shiites vs. Sunni vs Kurds in Iraq? Bush's God vs. Bin Laden's God?



>>[snip]
>>>I think I need to work on my grammer skills when typing fast. I meant to type "You questioned a religious person about parenting" I was pointing out to you that you asked a religious person their view on parenting and the advantage of being a parent who has a belief in God. I gave you my answer. At no time did I say you are a bad parent for being non-religious. I do not even know you or your family, so why would I say that. You asked me if there is an advantage to being a God-fearing parent. I indicated yes. If you choose not to believe in anything remotely religious, then that is your choice. I can only tell you what I believe.
>>
>>Why do you fear your God! It indicates that you are driven by negative ideas. Oh, never mind... we'll probably never agree.
>
>"God-fearing" is a phrase that has deeper meaning than the way you interpret it. Yes we'll probably never agree, but that does not mean we cannot have interesting discussions. Thanks for the back and forths.

(On an infant's shirt): Already smarter than Bush
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform