>>>>>Hi, one thing I will love to see in Sedna is Try/Catch working on SPT functions instead of using Aerror(). It will be good if TRY/CATCH traps all kind of errors.
>>>>>
>>>>>Luis
>>>>
>>>>Nice. Nicer would be if TRY/CATCH could trap all errors.
>>>>Cetin
>>>
>>>I don't agree here.
>>>ODBC, COM, Files access are external operations
>>>
>>>and it is very better if they return a state.
>>>
>>>You considers an async ODBC fetching,
>>>that fails during the fetch in backgroud,
>>>where is the CATCH that it captures the error?
>>>
>>>A mixed model is very confused.
>>>
>>>Different discourse the is implemented all with mechanisms of multithread callbacks,
>>>but this is far years light from VFP.
>>>
>>>Fabio
>>
>>I might want that. Try/Catch is not mandatory. There are cases where I'd like a try/catch.
>>Cetin
>
>I would prefer that they integrated Error() in the stack of the TRY so that
>VPF accept a THROW or a ERROR into the Error event.

Might be. Honestly I'm not a fan of Try/Catch.
Cetin