Versions des environnements
Network:
Windows 2000 Server
>>>>>>>>Hi, one thing I will love to see in Sedna is Try/Catch working on SPT functions instead of using Aerror(). It will be good if TRY/CATCH traps all kind of errors.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Luis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nice. Nicer would be if TRY/CATCH could trap all errors.
>>>>>>>Cetin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't agree here.
>>>>>>ODBC, COM, Files access are external operations
>>>>>>
>>>>>>and it is very better if they return a state.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You considers an async ODBC fetching,
>>>>>>that fails during the fetch in backgroud,
>>>>>>where is the CATCH that it captures the error?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>A mixed model is very confused.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Different discourse the is implemented all with mechanisms of multithread callbacks,
>>>>>>but this is far years light from VFP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Fabio
>>>>>
>>>>>I might want that. Try/Catch is not mandatory. There are cases where I'd like a try/catch.
>>>>>Cetin
>>>>
>>>>I would prefer that they integrated Error() in the stack of the TRY so that
>>>>VPF accept a THROW or a ERROR into the Error event.
>>>
>>>Might be. Honestly I'm not a fan of Try/Catch.
>>
>>Why are'nt you Cetin? Any interesting information to share?
>
>I ceertainly can't speak for Cetin, but one glaring problem with it is that what it DOESN'T catch isn't documented in a ny place that I have found. And we know it doesn't catch everything.
I'm sure, nobody, on this planet,
can say exactly, what "CATCH" catches or it doesn't catch.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement