[snip]
>Too many people want to litigate OTHERS to HAVE to follow their position without giving that considerationas well. The forced secularism in our culture in the name of tolerance is just one such example. Why athiests have to spend so much effort over something they don't believe in anyway baffles me (as an example). They don't like the fact that I believe? Fine. Don't force me to not express (remove freedom of speech) my position just because you don't agree. I tolerate your non-god thoughts - tolerate my god-thoughts. I don't care if you think I'm a fool. *shrug* A real one-sided position all too often is seems.
>
>I have no desire to force someone to believe something THEY choose not to believe. I just object to their attemts to silence me. I am not trying to silence them but often they don't seem to 'get' fairness. again, *shrug*.
Doug, in another spot you say you enjoy having discussions WITH people, not AT them. I hope that the above statement is in accordance with that wish. In other words, that you were not talking here AT.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
