>>
>>Have you considered that there are years with 53 weeks?!
>>
>
>I know there are some years where there would be 53 weeks but I (my business logic) ignores those.
But week 53 cannot be displayed as week 1. So, how do you solve that?
>>>I wanted the speed because (I think) that the user will be frustrated if they have to wait (even 2 seconds) after clicking on the label. So far, in my tests, on my PC, it seems to be very fast, not even a second.
>>
>>Not even a second? The function should be less than 10 milliseconds! :)
>
>Yes, you are right. I was just being paranoid <g>. But, in the process, I learned something.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
