>>>>>>
>>>>>>Have you considered that there are years with 53 weeks?!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I know there are some years where there would be 53 weeks but I (my business logic) ignores those.
>>>>
>>>>But week 53 cannot be displayed as week 1. So, how do you solve that?
>>>>
>>>
>>>What I meant to say is I have 52 labels with captions "1" through "52". So, as far as user is concerned, they "don't know" that week 53 is possible.
>>
>>So you think that your customer is stupid enough?
>
>Not at all. In the user manual it is explained that because week 53 does not occur every year, we choose not to schedule anything for that week. Therefore, the user has a chance to "catch up" with the backlog of work. Or, if they have no backlog, they simply rest that week. No one ever complained about it <g>.
Okay, thought about. :)
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
