>Oh gosh, at the risk of beating a dead horse, why is it that people post at the bottom of a previous post? Shouldn't it be at the top? Yes, it's out of order in a sense, but you already know what has been said and so should other readers, so posting at the top makes for easier reading. And it's a pain when the original post was so long and you have to scoll so far to see a reply.
>
>Alright, now I'm going to run and take cover, because I here the incoming ordinance already . . . <g>
>
>Russell
>

Russell, you require too much to my English:)