Doesn't that take the cake!!!

I'll be looking for SergeyB's apology to FabioL for Sergey's snotty "Instead of directly participating in improving VFP, Fabio prefers sit aside and complain. remark about FabioL.


>Fabio,
>Look what text I found here: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1C06E35D-10A2-4A05-84FC-495B3A73ECF7&displaylang=en
>
>Beta Feedback
>To submit a bug report for the public SP1 beta, go to http://www.levelextreme.com and post a message to All in the section Visual FoxPro Beta in the Visual FoxPro forum. Please do not contact technical support for questions since the public beta is unsupported and is to be used as-is.
>
>So, they want it posted to All. I don't know why. What I find remarkable, is that they have decided to regard the UT as the main place for feedback. Wise decision.
>
>
>>>>For me the VFP9 SP1 Beta1 is better than the VFP9 RTM.
>>>
>>>So, do you advice people to use sp1 beta1 for their final applications?
>>
>>Of course,
>>i don't suggest of download VFP9SP1b1, BUILD Application and send it to the customers.
>>
>>But, since it needs to trust himself what the Team do,
>>I use it for the development, and if I don't see things more
>>strange of the usual one
>>(normally strange things I see one every 10 minutes)
>>I think that all the fixed C0005 are worth the risk.
>>
>>After all VFP9 is so away from the perfection
>>what it doesn't have sense apply so many theories
>>of the software engineering.