>>This message is not directed at anyone personally
>>so please, noone should take offense.
>>
>>But after having my mailbox clogged for days on
>>end with a discussion of how crappy VFP is, it's
>>getting rediculous.
>>
>>The UT, I thought, was more of a technical forum.
>>Discussions of this language is better then that
>>language belong on the newsgroups.
>>
>>If you don't like VFP, use another language.
>>
>>If you don't like Microsoft, use another vendor.
>>
>>If you don't like life, deep freeze yourself for
>>two hundred years.
>>
>>But ongoing bitching about VFP certainly is
>>not constructive critisism, just bitching.
>
>
>I totally agree.

I guess some of our colleagues here on UT is beginning to label me as one of the "MS/VFP opposition" which I think it should not be, and will never be for as long as I am a user of MS product. Nonetheless, since we are living in a democratic environment, where Majority rules and Minority fiscalizes, the existence of an opposition is much better in order to have that so called "check and balance" situation. Sorry if it sounds like politics.

As VFP users, it’s just like we are aboard in the same ship (VFP) and the captain of the ship is MS. And as a passenger, is it bad to get the attention of the captain or officer of the ship, and say that there is something like a *hole* that needs patching in here??? We need there attention, and it’s up to them to validate the issue if it is reasonable or not. To me, UT should be a *No Holds Bared* forum, for as long as the topic or reply is related to the subject matter, and it is bounded within the parameters of its by-laws or rules and regulations, otherwise, better live in blah..blah country, where life has no challenge.

After all, I am still a VFP loyalist and a user, and a client of Microsoft. In fact, we are very much dependent on the product - Visual Studio as a whole - and 80 percent of our projects are being done in VFP platforms.