>I noticed that many developers seem to have upgraded until VFP version 6, but then stopped. At work we still use version 6. I suggested upgrading, but it seems they are not too keen on the expense. A while ago, the reason was rather the compatibility with operating systems (version 8 or later is not designed to work with Windows 95), but by now, that should be irrelevant.
>
>I was wondering, for what reasons other develoeprs remained with version 6. Is it the upgrade cost? The Windows versions supported? Not enough time to learn the new features? Or some other reason?

I have noticed this too. It is the reason that I develop most of the tools I offer to be backwards compatible to VFP 6.0. I may loose some of the near new features, but the number of developers who could benifit from the tools is greater.