>"Golly gee whiz" implies you are trying to act innocent. It doesn't matter to me whether you agree or disagree, I said earlier that I do not understand how any intelligent person could read, verbatim, the phone conversation and only get political incorrectness out of it. I stand by that. Others went the "stupid" route.
>
>>Sorry, I don't know the expression "golly gee whiz". But reading your post, I must assume that, according to you, everyone who you disagree with is stupid? And how can you conclude that I am not looking for a serious discussion? You puzzle me.
>>
>>>You said, "Now.. where am I, according to you, on the interval from intelligent to stupid?" What did you expect me to say, knowing full well that I disagree with your position. You were not looking for a serious discussion. I replied in the same vein that you asked. I'm not sure why you are playing this in such a "golly gee whiz" way.
>>>
>>>>HUH??? I invited you to read and reply to my comments on the transcript. You didn't really. And now you're accusing ME of no longer being serious? You must be kidding!
>>>>
>>>>>That's pretty much what I got out of your post. I replied in the same vein.
>>>>>
>>>>>>You're no longer seriously trying to make a good discussion. Pity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If it's based entirely on my other post, you are at the top of your class with with Alex. Can't speak for other areas...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Okay, thanks for the clear explanation. Now.. where am I, according to you, on the interval from intelligent to stupid?