Trying to act innocent? You puzzle me. What was I accused of?
Instead, I could state that YOU are the one who now tries to act innocent. You act as if you did not at all suggest stupidity, but your words can easilly be interpreted as such. How come, you don't see that? Or am I now evaluating your words out-of-context? How does that feel?

>"Golly gee whiz" implies you are trying to act innocent. It doesn't matter to me whether you agree or disagree, I said earlier that I do not understand how any intelligent person could read, verbatim, the phone conversation and only get political incorrectness out of it. I stand by that. Others deemed went the "stupid" route.
>
>>Sorry, I don't know the expression "golly gee whiz". But reading your post, I must assume that, according to you, everyone who you disagree with is stupid? And how can you conclude that I am not looking for a serious discussion? You puzzle me.
>>
>>>You said, "Now.. where am I, according to you, on the interval from intelligent to stupid?" What did you expect me to say, knowing full well that I disagree with your position. You were not looking for a serious discussion. I replied in the same vein that you asked. I'm not sure why you are playing this in such a "golly gee whiz" way.
>>>
>>>>HUH??? I invited you to read and reply to my comments on the transcript. You didn't really. And now you're accusing ME of no longer being serious? You must be kidding!
>>>>
>>>>>That's pretty much what I got out of your post. I replied in the same vein.
>>>>>
>>>>>>You're no longer seriously trying to make a good discussion. Pity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If it's based entirely on my other post, you are at the top of your class with with Alex. Can't speak for other areas...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Okay, thanks for the clear explanation. Now.. where am I, according to you, on the interval from intelligent to stupid?