My title was not literal. It was complementary. My cleverness is so wasted on most people... Guess I need to find a new level of communication.

>Um, I think Craig was wondering why you're asking if it's John Harvey's doing, when if you read it, you learn it is indeed John Harvey's doing. He's just being more subtle than me. ;)
>
>>Did you?
>>
>>>Jay, did you actually read it?
>>>
>>>>http://members.microsoft.com/customerevidence/search/EvidenceDetails.aspx?EvidenceID=13385&LanguageID=1&PFT=Microsoft%20Visual%20FoxPro&TaxID=18791