>Jay
>
>If it's any concillation, I knew you were being ironic. But then again us Brits are a bit more sensitive. You'll have to excuse Tom - he IS from CA! :-)

lol I think part of it is the fact that my name is Thomas - show me! :)

>
>Besides, can you imagine anything going on in the Shelby police that John hasn't a hand in?
>
>Terry
>
>>Well, I did know it was him, but it's hard to put subtle inflections on the written word. In my mind, I know exactly how it sounded, but obviously to others, it sounded quite different. I thought the exclamation point would help. Not so...
>>
>>>Jay;
>>>
>>>When I saw VFP 9, police, and John Harvey mentioned I did not automatically accept that John Harvey of the UT was the person of concern. Professionally and personally, I like to confirm such things, as it is possible to be incorrect.
>>>
>>>Communication, conformation, and accuracy are important as opposed to supposition. We each interpret the spoken and written word in our own way.
>>>
>>>Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>>See my response to Mike elsewhere in the thread.
>>>>
>>>>>Because if you read it, you wouldn't need to ask the question in the thread subject.
>>>>>In other words...the answer is in the case study.