General information
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Environment versions
Network:
Windows 2000 Server
I thought someone said something about the blocksize. Maybe not definitive.
One thing that comes to mind... if it applies, you might try including the memo field in the REPLACE command only if the information has been updated.
Seems that should prevent some bloat, but I don't know for sure.
good luck
>Thanks guys - but did I get an answer from all that?
>
>I am sharing the table with the memo field and each user does use the table in a table buffered mode. I am changing and adding only about 1000 records.
>
>So what should I do to elimiate the bloat.
>
>John
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only